Fadem & Associates, APC is a Certified Family Law Specialist

Our Law Firm Is Dedicated To Defending Your Rights

In today’s world, many couples choose to build lives, homes, and families together without formally entering into a marriage. While cohabitation is common, the legal end of such a relationship can be a sudden and overwhelming nightmare. You may find yourself shocked to learn that, despite never saying “I do,” you may face a complex legal battle over assets, support, and property.

What is a “Marvin Action”?

Because California abolished common law marriage in 1896, the rights afforded to married couples do not automatically apply to those who cohabitate. However, the landmark California Supreme Court case Marvin v. Marvin recognizes that non-marital partners have the right to enforce contracts or agreements made during the relationship.

The Story of Marvin v. Marvin

The term “Palimony” originated when Michelle Triola Marvin sued actor Lee Marvin after their long-term relationship ended. Although they were never married, she claimed he had promised to support her for the rest of her life in exchange for her giving up her career to provide homemaking services.

Ultimately, the Court ruled that while she didn’t prove a contract existed in her specific case, California law does recognize non-marital relationship contracts. These agreements can be:

  • Written: Formal documents or even informal notes and letters.
  • Oral: Verbal promises made between partners.
  • Implied: Agreements inferred from the parties’ conduct and way of life.

Property Rights and “Community” Interests

One of the most distressing aspects of a Marvin Action is the realization that your digital and physical history—emails, texts, Valentine’s cards, and love notes—may become vital evidence in a court of law.

Even if your name is not on the deed to a home or a bank account, a partner may claim an interest in that property if they can prove there was an agreement or promise that the asset belonged to both of you. These “implied agreements” often look at:

  • Jointly pooling funds to pay a mortgage.
  • Statements made to third parties about shared ownership.
  • Sacrifices made by one partner to support the other’s career or property.

Navigating the Legal Landscape

Unlike a standard divorce, which takes place in Family Court, a Marvin Action is a civil contract dispute. This means it follows different procedural rules, including the right to a jury trial, and requires a high level of proof to prevail.

Critical Issues in Non-Marital Dissolution:

  • Property Division: Determining who owns the residence, vehicles, and investments.
  • Support Claims: Evaluating if a promise of lifetime or temporary support was made.
  • Child Custody & Support: While property is handled via civil contract law, issues involving children are still governed by the California Family Code.

Why You Need Expert Representation

Palimony cases are decided on a case-by-case basis, and the outcome often hinges on the smallest details of your shared history. Because these actions are subject to strict statutes of limitations, time is of the essence.

Your issue may be time sensitive, please contact our Law Firm to set-up your Initial Consultation.

Please read the FAQs’ prior to your Initial Consultation.

We practice in all California Counties. In addition, Our Attorneys represents clients throughout California, the United States, and foreign countries with regard to Hague Matters.

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

Loading...

CLIENT TESTIMONIALS

Professional and Skilled. Great Law Office! Mr. BJ Fadem is a knowledgeable and skilled attorney with great experience. Thank you!
Larry

Mr Fadem is extremely knowledgeable of the laws. Felt he was very in tuned to my needs and fought those. Would definitely would use again. HIGHLY RECOMMEND

Sharon

I have worked with Mr. Fadem on many occasions and he is as intelligent, professional, and dedicated as they come. His knowledge of family law is outstanding and I refer him to anyone who needs a specialized and highly skilled family law attorney.

Emily

The reason I return time and time again is knowledgeable employees and the respect I am treated with. I also think that the noncondensending matter in which I was treated was a prime factor.

Claude